Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Am Donnerstag000022, 22.08.2024 um 13:06 schrieb Python:But not the other way around. Nothing defined in §1.3 (like k or K)Le 22/08/2024 à 08:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :Sure, but fortunately I have not written anything like this.Am Mittwoch000021, 21.08.2024 um 09:31 schrieb Python:>
>>>Addendum : "the distance from A to B is x": this is wrong too.>
x is the coordinate of an event in system K, it is not, in
general, the distance between origins of K and k.
'x' is a generic coordinate in system K and means a distance from the center of K to a point on the x-axis.
>
Since system k was placed with its center upon the x-axis and B in the center of k, the distance from A to B would actually be x.
Systems k and K are not even mentioned in part I.2. So "system k was
placed with its center upon the x-axis and B in the center of k"
is a figment of your imagination in no way related to A.E. article.
Wrong, because definitions remain valid throughout the entire paper, unless stated otherwise.
Part I.1 is in no way supposed to refer to definitions stated in
part I.3.
I wrote, that defintions for §1.1 remain valind in §1.3, unless the author states otherwise.
Absolutely NOT. I was CLEARLY talking about §1.1. and §1.1 alone.Sure, but apparently you wanted to discuss a certain equation form part 1.3 on page 3.If an author defines some variable or other setting and later 'foregets' this definition, all older settings remain valid.>
And definitely NOT a definition of k/K that is stated LATER, moreover
neither K nor k are mentions in part I.1.
That was LATER than the introduction of K and k.It is a VERY good idea to use its brain, as long as it is functioning
>It is a VERY bad idea, to 'fill the blancs' in a scientific text, because it would invite to see, what simply isn't there.What you apparently want is simply inexaptable:>
you want the reader to find out, which definition is valid at a certain position of the text and which one already expired.
What I want is perfectly acceptable: that the reader has a functional
brain.
[snip more idiocies]
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.