Sujet : Re: Sync two clocks
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 23. Aug 2024, 21:42:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vaas5s$11p1g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 23.08.2024 18:52, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 23/08/2024 à 16:04, Python a écrit :
Le 23/08/2024 à 13:57, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
Le 23/08/2024 à 13:23, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>
Den 22.08.2024 21:12, skrev Doctor Richard Hachel:
>
Can you explain to me, in the greatest clarity, as Python recommends, what you mean, what you understand by the following words: "In special relativity, the notion of simultaneity is relative"?
It is remarkable that a person who pride himself of having studied relativity issues for 40 years is ignorant of the most basic concepts
in the Special Theory of Relativity.
>
I am not going to teach you SR (or GR).
If you really want to learn, read a book.
>
Please, a little more seriousness and dignity in your answers.
>
He is perfectly right. You've stuffed your own mind with idiotic
nonsense for 40 years, intoxicating your brain with silly unsound
idiocies. If you want to understand SR you HAVE TO empty all this
sh*t out from your mind and start from scratch.
No, it's not "perfectly right".
It's not up to me to pick up a book and read what relativists have said and written (I did forty years ago).
You ask what "the notion of simultaneity" is in SR,
despite the fact(?) that read about it 40 years ago?
So maybe to ask you to read a book now was not a bad advice?
It is up to the relativists to read what I have written, and to see if it is coherent or not.
Would that answer your question:
"What do you understand by the following words:
'In special relativity, the notion of simultaneity is relative'?"
I pointed out to Paul where the errors were, and although the language barrier may play a role, it is impossible for him not to understand what I am saying if it takes the effort to understand.
When did you point out an error of mine?
I have several times challenged you to respond to what I write,
but so far you have never pointed out an error in what I have written, because you have never addressed it at all.
You have always fled the challenge.
But if I have missed a post where you have pointed out
an error of mine, please resend it as a response to this post.
------------
Richard's idea of scientific behaviour:
"He" is Paul B. Andersen
He makes no effort and tirelessly repeats "Albert is God, and I am his prophet; Hachel is the suppository of Satan". >
This is not scientific behavior.
When you know that, why did you write it? :-D
-- Paulhttps://paulba.no/
Sync two clocks
Re: Sync two clocks
