Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
Le 26/08/2024 à 07:47, Thomas Heger a écrit :Well, thanks.>What you say is very interesting.
To illustrate the problem of Einstein's naming conventions, I write now, what these names actually meant:
>
>
K is a cartesian coordinate system, assumed to be at rest, non-rotating and unaccelerated in an Euclidean space, which is assumed to 'flat' and force free.
>
The orientations of the axes (of x, y and z) were not mentioned, but I use this setting:
x points right
y points 'inside' (if x and z define a two-dimensional plane, like the one you draw on)
z points up (because z is usually used for hight)
>
>
k is an equally normed coordinate system, which moves with velocity v along the x-axis of K 'to the right'. The coordinates had Greek letters as names (xsi, eta, zeta).
>
>
K' is a coordinate system with the same features as K, but which moves from the center of k along the xsi-axis of k 'to the left' with velocity -v
>
>
k' is the same, but moving to the left with velocity -w along the xsi-axis of k. (the difference between K' and k' is a diffent velocity w in case of k').
>
>
But how could possibly anybody interpret the names K, k, K' and k' in this way?
>
It required careful investigations to find out, what was actually meant.
>
And the used names themselves gave absolutely no hints, about how these symbols shall be interpreted.
>
In short: it is a very obscure system to name things!
>
Usually you need to find a way, by which things get names in a consistent manner, which the reader could eventually remember
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.