Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

Den 27.08.2024 17:31, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 27/08/2024 à 17:20, Python a écrit :

Le 27/08/2024 à 17:15, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
...

Let's take the proper time of accelerated objects. I am sure of my move, because everything is of great theoretical coherence from beginning to end when I speak of RR. Physicists are not capable of it, but they will NEVER say it, they prefer to insult and try to discredit.

>
A proof (several proofs as a matter of fact) that your claim violates
the principle of Relativity is in no way an insult.
>
It is a discredit, maybe, but that's your fault.

 What proof?
I am the only one, all relativist scientists combined, to have no internal theoretical contradiction (works in apparent speeds, fatal symmetry of reciprocities), and the only one who has never been found wanting by any experiment for 40 years.
What proof? Theoretical? Experimental?
Jean-Pierre, be serious.
 

Remember our discussion about the Large Hadron Collider?
Le 23/07/2024 à 23:29, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

 The physicists at CERN measures that the proton 'rotates'
11.25 thousand times per second, you "tell them that the proton rotates 78 million times per second."
 

Den 24.07.2024 00:19, Richard Hachel responded:

 Don't tell me you don't understand that the proton rotates 11.25 thousand times per second in the laboratory frame but 78 million times per second in the proton frame.
 This is called time dilation.
 

It is obviously OK that your theory predicts that while
a proton moves around the cycle once in the laboratory frame,
then the same proton moves around the cycle 6933 times
in the proton frame. Isn't it?
No internal contradictions here, is it? Or is it? :-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/