Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 28.08.2024 o 12:32, Python pisze:

Le 28/08/2024 à 06:17, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 28.08.2024 o 02:36, Python pisze:

Le 27/08/2024 à 18:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 27.08.2024 o 16:56, Python pisze:

Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 27.08.2024 o 16:31, gharnagel pisze:

...

Wozniak is pooping nonsense again.  His assertion only proves
that he is NOT an engineer, otherwise he would admit that the
GPS was ENGINEERED

>
All clocks ever were engineered, nothing special
about that

>
Really?

>
Really. Do you have a different opinion

>
I asked.

>
I answerred. And asked.
>

>

You wrote numerous times that clocks are not physical
devices.

>
And instead some delusional "Laws of Nature"
announced by your bunch of religious maniacs
they're  driven by ergonomics.

>
Are clocks physical devices or not?

>
Just in a part.

 Which part is not then?

A clock is an information carrier.
Like a book, for instance.
Do you know which part of a book is
not physical? What would you say
about its content?

The key factor determining
their behaviour remains outside the world of
your  pretty little formulas.

 And this factor is... ?

Ergonomics. Our needs. What we want them
to do. Or name it as you wish, it's not
physical anyway.