Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage

Am Mittwoch000028, 28.08.2024 um 13:04 schrieb Richard Hachel:

Le 28/08/2024 à 08:22, Thomas Heger a écrit :

>
That was all not under dispute.
>
Sure, these equation would allow tro calculate the delay.
>
(despite t_B and t_A' would be unknown at the remote side 'B')
>
But anyhow..
>
The problem was, that Einstein never used this value of the delay to compensate the timing value at the local side.
>
If you - for instance - peep through a large telescope and look at a large clock on the Moon and see the clock show e.g. 12:00:00:00 GMT, then you would see a time too early, because your own clock would show 12:00:01:00 GMT.
>
Now both clocks are actually in synch, even if the received view of the remote clock shows a different time then the local clock on Earth.
>
But Einstein failed to mention the required correction of the remote signal by adding the delay to the received time value.
>
This can only be interpreted, as if he didn't wanted to do that and leave the timing signal as received (what was wrong!!!).
>
TH

 What is absolutely essential is to re-explain things, with precise, simple terms.
How can we describe the spatio-temporal universe that surrounds us?
What is this "apparent delay"?
Why do two extremely well-synchronized watches show two different times?
Why, once joined, will they start to show the same time again?

I use 'spacetime' as reference to GR and in a way desribed by Minkowski.
This is kind of four-dimensional construct, where time is is meant as spatial dimension.
But I interpret time as imaginary scalar and space as real and come to something similar to a quaternion.
This 'quaternion' (actually the signature is wrong here) is the local interpretation of some background (or: 'real spacetime'), which has the odd property to allow different directions of time.
So: an 'anti-world' could exist, where time runs backwards.
In that antiworld the local perspective would also have time and space, but as kind of 'anti-quaternion' in our view.
We could now add both views and come to a construct known as 'biquaternions', which would describe and overlay of foreward and backwards time (and everything inbetween).
My 'theory' is actually based on this idea and can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
TH
...