Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 10. Sep 2024, 17:55:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6561f1a7f3f1c07c3e3621188897b77e@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 16:32, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 5:24:14 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
As expected from a relativistic piece of
shit - you're projecting your own lies,
backtracking and disinformation on me;
and your lack of responsibility as
well.
>
Mimicry is an infantile response, but that's
all Wozniak can do.
>
I can also present a proof that the mumble
of your idiot guru was not even consistent.
Wozzie-liar's baseless ass-insertion has been
refuted by logical argument and measurement.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein
>
For sure, your idiot guru was a true idiot,
but insisting he din't know the basics
of probabiloity - is, I think, too much.
For sure, the REAL idiot is lying Wozniak since
he keeps repeating his lies over and over and over
again, expecting that anyone would believe the
congenital liar that he is.

"The satellite clocks were designed to run slow
(dt') in orbit so they would appear to run
normally as measured from the ground (dt).
>
And their indications -  t and t' - are equal.
Wozzie-liar keeps insisting this is so without
even a single measurement as proof.  He pretends
that both t and t' are where they could both be
measured, but they are not.  This is the crux of
his disinformation.  He is either a fool, a liar
or both.

You keep lying they're not, but asked about
the numbers you only respond with a stream
of ravings, insults and slanders. Lies have
short legs, poor trash.
Wozzie-liar is projecting his own despicable
behavior.  Since he is a pathological lisr, he
believes everyone is lying to him, too.

  All the clocks on
earth are essentially in the same frame (dt), so
Wozzie-liar is being deceitful when he falsely
presumes that dt' refers to another clock on the
ground.  It's not, dt' refers to the clock on the
satellite measured AT the satellite, not what it
reads from the ground.  Wozzie-liar is fundamentally
dishonest."
>
So his dishonest claim that t' = t is a bald-faced
lie.  He doesn't have access to the clocks in the
satellite (t') nor the clocks in GPS stations on
the ground (t), so he cannot prove that t' = t,
he is only consulting his flimsy prejudice.  The
experimental evidence refutes his lies:
>
>
https://phys.org/news/2010-09-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal.html#:~:text=The%20aluminum%20clocks%20can%20detect%20small%20relativity-based%20effects,James%20Chin-Wen%20Chou%2C%20first%20author%20of%20the%20paper.

Anyone can check  GPS.
No, they can't check the clocks onboard the
satellites.  Wozzie liar is an idiot.  Has
HE checked the satellite clocks?  Maybe in
his delusional state he believes he can fly
up there and check, while holding his breath.

Time, as defined by your idiot guru himself -
remains galilean there, with the precision
of an acceptable error.
Cutting and pasting his own lies convinces no
one, particularly when they've been easily
refuted.

That's where the mad lies of your mad church
end.
Mad Maciej is paranoid, believing everyone is
lying to himself.  He doesn't understand that
probability greatly favors him as the liar
rather than thousands of scientists. :-))

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Sep 24 * Yes, t'=t in GPS.60Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.59Python
4 Sep 24  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.58Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.57gharnagel
4 Sep 24    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.56Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.14Python
4 Sep 24     i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.13Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.12Python
5 Sep 24     i  +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10Thomas Heger
5 Sep 24     i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24     i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24     i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24     i      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i        +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Sep 24     i        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24     i         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24     i          `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.41gharnagel
5 Sep 24      +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
5 Sep 24      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.39gharnagel
5 Sep 24       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.38Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.37gharnagel
6 Sep 24         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.36Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.35gharnagel
7 Sep 24           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.34Maciej Wozniak
8 Sep 24            `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.33gharnagel
8 Sep 24             `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.32Maciej Wozniak
9 Sep 24              `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.31gharnagel
10 Sep 24               `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.30gharnagel
10 Sep 24                `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.29gharnagel
10 Sep 24                 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.28Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Python
10 Sep 24                  i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Python
10 Sep 24                  i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                  i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Python
11 Sep 24                  i      `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.19gharnagel
10 Sep 24                   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.18Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Python
10 Sep 24                    i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    i +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                    i i+- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
11 Sep 24                    i i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24                    i i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
10 Sep 24                    i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
11 Sep 24                    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10gharnagel
11 Sep 24                     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
12 Sep 24                      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8gharnagel
12 Sep 24                       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
13 Sep 24                        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6gharnagel
13 Sep 24                         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4gharnagel
14 Sep 24                           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                            +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24                            `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1gharnagel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal