Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 10. Sep 2024, 21:27:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <2c4ad54c48038649d393c45944992f17@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Continuing with the "pseudoscience" subject, that was introduced in 1905
and became a cult.
Besides what was described in the OP of this thread, there are other
dogmas that grew from the 1905 paper.
1) Stupidity ONE: Length contraction.
Material objects that move along with the relatively moving frame, at
velocity v, suffer from LENGTH CONTRACTION, as dictated by Lorentz
transform (Gamma factor).
This length contraction IS PERCEIVED! by an observer located at the
origin of the relatively stationary frame. Such "phenomenon" increase
with v, reaching length ZERO IF v = c.
An observer moving along with the second frame DON'T PERCEIVE the
longitudinal contraction of the object located near him. It's only
PERCEIVED by the stationary observer, BECAUSE LORENTZ TRANSFORMS SAY SO.
But, incredibly, such effect IS NOT PERMANENT. If relative motion
ceases, because v=0, the object (as perceived by the stationary
observer) MIRACULOUSLY recovers the original longitudinal length.
Nothing happened here.
TELL ME THAT THIS ILLUSION IS NOT IDIOTIC! Yet, the acceptance of this
crap remains for the last 110 years.
2) Stupidity TWO: Time dilation.
Remember what Einstein wrote in his 1905 paper: TIME IS WHAT MY CLOCK
(MECHANICAL) SHOWS.
In this case, the second phenomenon (time dilation) occurs in the clock
(mechanical) that the moving observer has. This is PERCEIVED by the
observer at relative rest (ONLY BY HIM). For the moving observer,
NOTHING HAPPENS WITH THE FLOW OF TIME, AS SHOWN IN HIS CLOCK. He doesn't
perceive ANY time dilation.
Now, in contrast with length contraction, this phenomenon IS PERMANENT!!
If relative motion v ceases, and both clocks (from the observer at rest
and the moving observer), time dilation became A PERMANENT EFFECT!! The
clock of the moving observer shows less time elapsed, in comparison with
the clock of the observer at rest.
If length contraction was a stupid concept, time dilation IS BEYOND
STUPIDITY. It's INSANE!
Yet, relativists embraced this IDIOCY, and claim that GPS is the most
important experimental result of corrections applied to such system,
thanks to Einstein and his mechanical clock.
SEE WHY RELATIVITY IS A PSEUDOSCIENCE? BECAUSE IT'S BASED ON A SET OF
LORENTZ TRANSFORMS, WHICH RESULTS ARE FORCED TO BE ACCEPTED BY
RELATIVISTS, OR THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO THE CULT IS TERMINATED.
RELATIVITY IS BASED ON FAITH, LIKE ANY PAGAN RELIGION. YOU'RE NOT
ALLOWED TO QUESTION MATTERS OF FAITH.
STUPIDITY contaminated what used to be an honest science. Now, it's
GARBAGE.
That's why, in the last 60 years (and increasingly), TECHNOLOGY has
replaced MOST of what remained of this science, which had a
philosophical start 330 years ago, with Newton.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Sep 24 * Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.14rhertz
10 Sep 24 +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.12Paul.B.Andersen
10 Sep 24 i+* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.3gharnagel
10 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2rhertz
11 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Sep 24 i`* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
11 Sep 24 i `* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.7rhertz
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Python
11 Sep 24 i  +* Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Sep 24 i  i`- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  +- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i  `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1Richard Hachel
10 Sep 24 `- Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.1LaurenceClarkCrossen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal