Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.

Le 11/09/2024 à 02:35, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

This DIABOLIC LIE was supported increasingly over the next 90 YEARS,
till mid 1990s, when the relativistic community started to ABANDON THIS
IDEA (90 years of idiocy and counting). Thanks to the relentless work of
prestigious relativists (like the Russian Okun), MOST OF THE COMMUNITY
switched to the concept of increase of kinetic energy, accepting that
MASS is INVARIABLE.
 So, instead of thinking AND USING for 90 years the concept of mass
increase under inertial motion:
 M = Mo/√(1 - v²/c²)
 relativists switched (the majority of them, EVEN TODAY) to this
expression of KE increase:
  KE = (1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1) Mo, which doesn't include THE FAKE VALUE Mo of
any mass at (relative) rest.
 This was done, and still is done, WHILE THERE IS NOT A SINGLE IDEA ABOUT

That's exactly it.
The mass remains unchanged, and we absolutely do not need it to change to explain very simply the behavior of particles in space and time.
We therefore have a quantity of movement in direct relation to the speed, and whatever the speed, the same simplistic equation:
p=m.Vr
We know that with the speed relativistic decoys appear,
and that the true speed (Vr) is no longer measured correctly, but only as a simply OBSERVABLE, measurable speed, Vo, and that relativistic corrections are needed.
We then set Vo=Vr/sqrt(1+Vr²/c²). and there is no longer any need to bother with stupid ideas that physicists love to eat.
This equation leads directly, by permutation, to:
Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
and so we have:
p=m.[Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)]
Same for energy, and kinetic energy.
E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²)
E=mc²/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
No point in seeing a relativity of masses when we have already seen a relativity, a decoy, on speeds. Time and space are enough to explain RR. Exit masses and charges. No need to add hippotatamuses or car batteries.
R.H.