Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,

On 09/15/2024 05:31 AM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 15.09.2024 03:26, skrev rhertz:

>
As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
>
As they wrote here:
>
https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-with-unprecedented-precision
>

>
Didn't you notice the headline which is even in the link above?
>
"First results from Microscope satellite confirm Albert Einstein’s
  theory of relativity with unprecedented precision.
>
Quote:
"Measurements of the equivalence principle had not been improved
  upon for 10 years, but now the first results from CNES’s Microscope
  satellite, equipped with accelerometers supplied by the French
  aerospace research agency ONERA, are 10 times better. They show,
  with an unprecedented precision of 2.E-14, that bodies in a vacuum
  fall with the same acceleration. The equivalence principle has so
  far proved unshakeable and this result simply reconfirms the theory
  of general relativity postulated by Albert Einstein over a century
  ago."
>
Where did you read that
"THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL"?
>
Another quote:
"A universal theory unifying gravitation and quantum physics is
  therefore the holy grail of physicists in the 21st century.
  Certain candidate theories predict that the principle of
  the equivalence between gravitation and acceleration, at
  the heart of the theory of general relativity, could be violated
  at very weak levels. Microscope is pushing this principle to its
  limits and yielding new indications to constrain the theory of
  general relativity."
>
Note this!
Certain candidate theories predict that the equivalence principle
could be violated at very weak levels.
>
These candidate theories are alternative theories to GR.

>
QUOTE:
>
«The satellite’s performance is far exceeding expectations. Data from
more than 1,900 additional orbits are already available and more are to
come, which should enable us to further improve the mission’s
performance and approach its target of acquiring measurements with a
precision of 10-15. This first result is going to shake the world of
physics and will certainly lead to a revision of alternative theories to
general relativity,» said the mission’s principal investigator Pierre
Touboul.

>
It is the alternative theories which predict that
the equivalence principle could be violated at very weak levels
that have to be revised, not GR.
>
Because this experiment has shown that the equivalence principle
is NOT violated at very weak levels.
>
>
How is it possible to read a text, and believe that it says
the exact opposite of what it says?
>
You have yet again made a giant fool of yourself, Richard.
>
Well done! :-D
>

>
Enjoy slowly, relativists. Please don't choke on your stupidity, as you
are allowed to fail for being just humans.

>
Did you shoot yourself in the foot, Richard? :-D
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfONckOPyaI
>

You know they say the Parker satellite was the fastest-moving thing
while it was exploring its solar station in sort of the same
way as Lense-Thirring was able to make frame-dragging confirm
what's been historically a sort of ether-drift hypothesis which
these days is usually named "aether" to help distinguish that
modern theories after the Equivalence Principle help relate
that it's terrestrial, in effect, as with regards to the
things like "g-forces" and so on.
If perhaps you've read the great paper that came out recently
or within a few years, as it was also discussed here, with
regards to the great survey of experiments validing the
Equivalence Principle, I wrote a criticism of it.
If you think "frame-dragging" and "ether-drift" are so different,
they're not.
I.e., Parker measured the solar system's motion relative
to the surrounds similarly as to how Lense-Thirring did,
Earth's.
The high-energy and low-energy
or for example "Higgs" and "Little Higgs"
help explore that there's a neutrino/muon/hadron
physics emerging as after electron physics.