Re: No evidence

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 5:41:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 15.09.2024 o 02:06, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 23:06:47 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

>
Mikko: How can we know the different rates of atomic clocks in space

are

due to gravity when there are numerous differences in that

environment

from Earth?

>
(1) The satellite clocks are isolated from environmental conditions

with

the exception of relative velocity and gravitational field.
>
(2)
>

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-

clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
>
NIST scientists performed the new "time dilation" experiments by

>
There is no time dilation in the real world,

confirmation bias: only seeking information to validate what is already
believed.
“Two-thirds of what we see is behind our eyes.” --Chinese proverb

anyone can check GPS,

Not unless they can jump 20000 km high and breathe vacuum :-)

time (as defined by your idiot guru himself) is galilean, with
the precision of an acceptable error.

Denial of reality is a common mental illness.

comparing operations of a pair of the world's best experimental
atomic clocks.

>
Anyone can check GPS,

Not unless they can jump 20000 km high and breathe vacuum :-))
But they can check the results of aluminum atomic clocks right
here on earth, if they're not afraid of having their delusional
protection bubble burst.
https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4527

the best of physicists means unusable for serious measurements

What kind of measurements has a self-proclaimed "information
engineer" made?  as opposed to REAL engineers and scientists:
"We have constructed an optical clock with a fractional frequency
inaccuracy of 8.6e-18" -- https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4527

 crap.

Got coprophilia?