Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Den 18.09.2024 13:37, skrev ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog:

On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 2:30:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:
 

http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/HK50/1971-PTTI-Vol-03_17.pdf

 The above had been written BEFORE their full analysis using the
method of correlated rate-change analysis, which I described earlier.
So yes, the initial analysis did not look all that great, but the
full analysis making use of all of the inter-comparison data was
able to resolve the clock glitches.
 Nowadays, cesium clocks have far greater stability, and convincing
results can be obtained using single clocks on short flights
and WITHOUT any sophisticated data analysis.
http://resource.npl.co.uk/docs/publications/newsletters/metromnia/ issue18_einstein.pdf
 Why do you keep attempting to knock down the H&K experiment?

Because the H&K experiment is in the list :
Richard Hertz wrote:
"And about your list of historical proofs of relativity, I can make a
  deep forensic analysis of them, proving beyond any reasonable doubt,
  that relativists are members of a MAFFIA, and profit from it. This is
  because the different results are COOKED with the help of statistical
  manipulations, fraud, cooking and peer complicity."
:-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/