Re: No evidence

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: No evidence
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 20. Sep 2024, 12:14:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <a1ce6d9fc3f4e70718cea0b399c66b1f@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 5:11:52 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 18.09.2024 o 23:05, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:09:59 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
See, poor trash - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
guru to be inconsistent,
>
Repeating a refuted assertion doesn't make it true, neither
do insults and pasted lies.
>
and you can do nothing about it apart of spitting,
insulting and slandering.
>
I've presented solid evidence that Wozniak's assertions
[> > are completely false.  Since he has serious mental issues,
he will do what he can for his beloved coprophilia and
his beloved satanic Church of What Never Happened.]
Wozniak cannot delete the truth that he lies incessantly.

I've pointed directly 2 denying themself
predictions of the physics
A regurgitated lie, refuted by previous posts.

of your idiot guru;
Which proves that Wozniak is the insulting and
slandering one projecting his shortcomings on
others.

so I've proven its inconsistency.
Only in Wozniak's dreams.  His "proof" is
invalid because he misrepresents the meaning
of t and t'.

A fanatic scumbag screaming "NOOOO!!!"
raving, insulting and slandering is
changing nothing, dorry, trash.
and that Wozniak is the one screaming, raving,
insulting and slandering.

"NIST scientists performed the new "time
dilation" experiments by comparing
[> > operations of a pair of the world's best
experimental atomic clocks. The nearly
identical clocks are each based on the
"ticking" of a single aluminum ion
(electrically charged atom) as it vibrates
between two energy levels over a million
billion times per second."
"In one set of experiments, scientists
raised one of the clocks by jacking up the
laser table to a height one-third of a meter
(about a foot) above the second clock. Sure
enough, the higher clock ran at a slightly
faster rate than the lower clock, exactly as
predicted."
"The second set of experiments examined the
effects of altering the physical motion of
the ion in one clock. (The ions are almost
completely motionless during normal clock
operations.) NIST scientists tweaked the one
ion so that it gyrated back and forth at
speeds equivalent to several meters per
second. That clock ticked at a slightly
slower rate than the second clock, as
predicted by relativity."]
Dishonest Wozniak tries to delete evidence,
REAL information, restored here, that refutes
his lies.

And in the meantime in the real world -
forbiddewn by your insane church
"engineered" clocks keep measuring
t'=t, just like all serious clocks
always did.
Wozniak misrepresents t' and t in his never-
ending insults and slanders, he deceitfully
asserts that dt' and dt have nothing to do with
t' and t, and he pretends that t' is just
another clock keeping t time.  The t' clock is
in the satellite, which has no observer.
Wozniak is a congenital liar.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Sep 24 * Re: No evidence39LaurenceClarkCrossen
13 Sep 24 +* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
14 Sep 24 i`- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
14 Sep 24 `* Re: No evidence36Mikko
15 Sep 24  +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i+- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
15 Sep 24  i +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24  i `- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24  `* Re: No evidence30LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Sep 24   +* Re: No evidence11gharnagel
15 Sep 24   i+* Re: No evidence9LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24   ii`* Re: No evidence8gharnagel
16 Sep 24   ii +- Re: No evidence (rotating frames)1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24   ii `* Re: No evidence6gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii  `* Re: No evidence5gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii   `* Re: No evidence4gharnagel
18 Sep 24   ii    `* Re: No evidence3gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii     `* Re: No evidence2gharnagel
20 Sep 24   ii      `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
16 Sep 24   i`- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
15 Sep 24   `* Re: No evidence18Mikko
15 Sep 24    +- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence4LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence3Mikko
17 Sep 24    i +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
20 Sep 24    i `- Re: No evidence1Thomas Heger
15 Sep 24    +* Re: No evidence5LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24    i`* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24    i `* Re: No evidence3Richard Hachel
19 Sep 24    i  `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24    i   `- Re: No evidence1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24    `* Re: No evidence7LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1gharnagel
16 Sep 24     +- Re: No evidence1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Sep 24     `* Re: No evidence4Mikko
17 Sep 24      `* Re: No evidence3LaurenceClarkCrossen
19 Sep 24       `* Re: No evidence2Mikko
19 Sep 24        `- Re: No evidence1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal