Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 25. Sep 2024, 15:50:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <Hy5EIjcbdfraulhaTC2Ajbpoa7A@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 25/09/2024 à 07:08, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 24.09.2024 o 22:57, Richard Hachel pisze:
Le 24/09/2024 à 17:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>
1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
"counterexamples" against Euclidean
prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
on Earth surface.
>
Relativistic doggies have invented them -
after their idiot guru announced EG false.
Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of
ideology oriented branches of science.
>
Nobody announced Euclidean Geometry false
>
Is it still assumed true, then? REALLY true,
poor stinker?
>
>
  (quite the
opposite actually). You'll never get it. Face it
Maciej.
>
Find another hobby.
>
No.
Command some glowing worms instead, poor
stinker.
 Euclidean geometry no longer applies when we go
 Sure, sure. Basic mathematics doesn't apply - because
an idiot has  asserted.
Is 2+2=22 as well - when your "theory" needs it?
No, I have never needed to say that 2+2=22 to establish my theories (not just physical ones) and I always start from very serious and Cartesian principles.
Those who say that I believe that 2+2=22 have not read me.
They are idiots.
I am much more Cartesian and much stronger than most relativist theorists but they will never admit it.
I am not talking about men who turn into spaghettithis near black holes, I am not talking about flying saucers and Roswell, I am not talking about disks whose circumference contracts without the radius moving, I am not talking about Langevin travelers who are followers of the time gap, and other stupidities that physicists, new preachers of the prophet Einstein, are very fond of.
I beg you, therefore, not to say stupid things about me, lying things which will serve no purpose except to excite fools.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math10Maciej Wozniak
24 Sep 24 `* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math9Python
24 Sep 24  `* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math8Maciej Wozniak
24 Sep 24   +* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math3Python
25 Sep 24   i`* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math2Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24   i `- Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math1Python
24 Sep 24   `* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math4Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24    `* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math3Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24     `* Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math2Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24      `- Re: About the relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic math1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal