Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 27. Sep 2024, 21:13:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <1d99145e3c16639ebbc7ca6fc3d2b4c3@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:53:42 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 27.09.2024 02:47, skrev rhertz:
Final remarks about why I believe that Paul is a fraudster. Actually, I
think that you are much more stupid than fraudulent.
<snip all the text that you REPEATED from my post>

Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
The USNO clocks advances τ₀ = 65.42 hours during the 65.42 hours trip,
>
I put the values:
τ₀ = 65.42 h = 235512 s
R = 6378137 m
Ω = 7.2921159e-5 rad/s
c = 299792458 m/s
v = 2πR/τ₀ = +170.16 m/s
>
into THE FORMULA  Δτₖ = (-(2RΩv + v²)/2c²)τ₀
and get Δτₖ = -245.32 ns.
>
>
This is the kinematic term, so it is only part of the difference
between the USNO clock and the "flying" clock.
>
>
But can you please explain why doing what I did made me a fraudster?
<snip only my reply>

I have no further comment to this gem! :-D

See, Paul, WHY YOU ARE A FRAUDSTER OR IMBECILE BEYOND REDEMPTION?
>
I go for an IMBECILE, A BLIND ONE. But that is just me.
>
Quite. That's indeed just Richard Hertz.
END OF QUOTING
When cornered, a relativistic idiot like you WILL NEGATE any evidence of
a fraud, as if his life depends on it (or, maybe such threat is real for
an indoctrinated imbecile).
I´LL REPEAT ONE MORE TIME:
YOU CAN'T, UNDER ANY DECENT ASSUMPTION, DARE TO ESTIMATE WHAT WAS THE
ELAPSED TIME AT THE USNO CLOCKS IN WASHINGTON, IF YOU ARE 15,000 MILES
FAR AWAY AND HAVE NOT ANY MEANS (NOT EVEN AS OF TODAY) TO ESTIMATE THE
TIME VALUE OF SUCH REFERENCE CLOCK.
WHEN YOU ASSUME THAT IT'S CORRECT TO ESTIMATE SUCH ELAPSED TIME AS THE
REMOTE FLIGHT TIME PLUS TIME SPENT AT AIRPORTS (65.42 HOURS), YOU ARE
BEYOND CRETINISM, BECAUSE OVER THAT RESULT YOU DARE TO ESTIMATE A 200
NSEC DIFFERENCE WITH THE HAFELE'S CLOCKS.
WHEN YOU ACCEPT THAT OVER A THEORETICAL VALUE OF 235,512,000,000,000
NSEC ELAPSED AT USNO CLOCKS (VALUE PULLED OUT OF YOUR ASS),
THEORETICALLY CAN ESTIMATE A DIFFERENCE OF 200 NSEC, YOU ARE A LIAR, A
DECEIVER AND A FRAUDSTER.
CAPITO?
YOUR REPUTATION AS AN IMBECILE IS WRITTEN ALL OVER THE GOOGLE FORUM FOR
MORE THAN 20 YEARS. YOU CAN'T ESCAPE FROM SUCH HISTORY OF YOUR
ADVENTURES HERE. I DON'T KNOW HOW A FRAUDSTER FEEL ABOUT HIMSELF OR HOW
CAN HE LIVE WITH SUCH SHAME, BECAUSE I'M AN HONEST PERSON AND ALWAYS
HAVE BEEN. SOMETHING THAT YOUR PARENTS TEACH, BUT THEY FAILED ON YOU.
NOW, GO AND HIDE IN SHAME FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS, UNTIL THIS FADES. IT'S
WHAT YOU'VE DONE ALL THESE YEARS, WHEN CAUGHT WITH YOUR LIES OR YOUR
STUPID COMMENTS.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 Sep 24 * Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!30rhertz
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!22Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 i+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!19rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii+* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!16rhertz
25 Sep 24 iii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!15rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
27 Sep 24 iii i i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii i i `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
28 Sep 24 iii i i  `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
1 Oct 24 iii i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Maciej Wozniak
26 Sep 24 iii `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!7Paul.B.Andersen
26 Sep 24 iii  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6rhertz
26 Sep 24 iii   `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5Paul.B.Andersen
27 Sep 24 iii    `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!4rhertz
27 Sep 24 iii     `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3rhertz
28 Sep 24 iii      `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
29 Sep 24 iii       `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 ii`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Paul.B.Andersen
25 Sep 24 ii `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1rhertz
25 Sep 24 i+- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
25 Sep 24 i`- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
26 Sep 24 +- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1bertietaylor
30 Sep 24 `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!6J. J. Lodder
1 Oct 24  `* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!5rhertz
1 Oct 24   +* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!3Paul.B.Andersen
1 Oct 24   i`* Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!2Maciej Wozniak
2 Oct 24   i `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1Richard Hachel
5 Oct 24   `- Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!1J. J. Lodder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal