Re: Oh my God!

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:48:27 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:53:41 +0000, gharnagel wrote:

So let's look at the figure on the right with v = 0.1c.  As viewed
from S, t1 = \gamma (0 + 0.1L) = 0.1gL.  At that time in S, the time
in C is not at t = 0.  This is relativity of simultaneity (RoS).
Prok, YOU are the one trying to rip SR to shreds by pretending you
can ignore RoS.  Figures 4 and 5 in DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101
obey RoS, your figures do not.

In the left panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at
(x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0)
In the middle panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at
(x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0)
In the right panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at
(x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0)
In other words, my motions as an observer can do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
to alter the emission and receipt of the signals as measured in S'
To believe otherwise is insane.