Re: vis-viva and vis-motrix

On 10/01/2024 06:27 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 01/10/2024 à 08:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :

>
This causes a 'mirror world', which exists invisble 'behind the mirror'.

>
This all smells like Alice in Wonderland.
>
Let's be much more rational.
>

TH

>
R.H.
>

Oh, do you start with there being at least three
definitions of "continuous domain" so that the
foundations of mathematics provides _both_ of
Aristotle's notions of continuous domains
(i.e., including both the Archimedean field
and atomism), and as well for example a modern
sort of signal-information, at least three
distinct definitions of continuous domains?
Carroll or Dodgson, wrote children's literature,
then also there's the "Raven and the Writing Desk"
bit, then also, Dodgson wrote up some examples
of mathematical infinitesimals, basically those
branching off each item in the geometric series,
and recursing off those, where examples like Zeno,
Democritus atomism, and Peano, Veronese and Stolz,
Dodgson, Conway, Robinso(h)n, Bell, Brouwer, after
Cavalieri, then for Newton and Leibniz, how Maclaurin
wrote it, these are all with regards to "mathematical
infinitesimals", as what are like infinities to
absolute infinity, infinitesimals to zero.
Anyways, then if your mathematics does not have
within it the at least three distinct definitions
of continuous domains, then I wonder how you can
think that it would ever be a foundation of physics,
also.