Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!

W dniu 01.10.2024 o 13:27, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 01.10.2024 01:16, skrev rhertz:

On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:37:55 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

>
For the innocent kiddies who might have strayed in here:
Relativity, both special and general theory,
is long past the stage where demonstration experiments are relevant.
>
Like with any mature science,
much of it has passed into everyday engineering.
Much engineering requires high accuracies nowadays,
and to achieve these accuracies
relativistic corrections need to be taken into account.
>
Information networks are synchronised, satnav just works,
power grids can remain synchronised over continents,
shares are bought and sold in microseconds,
accelerators accelerate, star positions are measured
to micro-arcseconds, space probes get routinely navigated
through the whole solar system, and so on, and so on.
All of this would not be possible
without correctly taking relativistic time into acount.
>
So, just ignore the noises, except for amusement,
>
Jan

>
*************************************************************
Your patent ignorance and your level of indoctrination on relativity are
shocking. Even more than that, are DISGUSTING in extreme levels.
>
Typical of a die hard relativist is to attribute every scientific
advance in physics and engineering to relativity. It can be taken well
among the members of your cult but, for critics of relativity such
actions generates laugh and, even more, a LOT OF PITY when contemplating
how ruined its judgment is.
>
>
EVERY SINGLE COMMENT YOU MADE, FALSELY ATTRIBUTING TO RELATIVITY
ADVANCES IN SCIENCE, MAKES ME FEEL BAD FOR YOU AND YOUR IGNORANCE.
>
1) Information networks are synchronised.
>
Information networks run over DIGITAL HIGHWAYS based on fiber optics,
photonics and atomic clocks, which are the Level 1 of global information
networks. Software for routing and information run SEVERAL LAYERS ABOVE.
Digital communications progress IS UNRELATED TO RELATIVITY.
>
2) satnav just works.
>
Current GNSS are just an evolutionary step over different techniques
from the last 70 years. The impact of relativity on these networks IS
JUST A RELATIVISTIC MYTH.
>
3) power grids can remain synchronised over continents.
>
This is, ESSENTIALLY, due to every single country institution in charge
of keeping time with respect to BIPM, obtaining a sync level of +/- 10
nsec worldwide. This has been achieved thanks to 1) and GNSS, for
distribution of signaling info, at the lowest level of processing.
>
https://www.bipm.org/en/
>
NO RELATIVITY ROLE HERE.
>
>
4) shares are bought and sold in microseconds.
>
Same as above (3). Computer networks are synchronized thousand of times
less tightly than digital communication networks, because SOFTWARE is a
random process with random delays, which is not the case of digital
networks (Level 1). Just the use of routers introduces the first layer
of random delays. Software (Level 4+) introduces MORE random delays.
With PROPER ALGORITHMS, sync can be established at microsec levels.
>
NO RELATIVITY ROLE HERE.
>
>
5) accelerators accelerate.
>
?????????
>
6) star positions are measured to micro-arcseconds.
>
NO RELATIVITY ROLE HERE.
>
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Gaia
>
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Gaia/ How_does_Gaia_study_the_Milky_Way
>
>
7) space probes get routinely navigated through the whole solar system.
>
ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
>
>
NO RELATIVITY ROLE HERE.
>
>
NEWTON RULES EVERYWHERE ON SPATIAL NAVIGATION.

 Well said, Richard.
 Considering that all physicists born after 1900 are members of
a MAFFIA, and profit from it, and their experimental results are
COOKED with the help of statistical manipulations, fraud, cooking
and peer complicity, it is clear that NEWTON RULES.
 Physics hasn't evolved at all for since 1900.
 You can OBVIOUSLY design particle accelerators and Satellite navigation
systems and synchronise TAI-clocks with Newtonian mechanics only.

Doesn't your moronic Shit forbid to
synchronize moving relatively clocks,
poor halfbrain?