Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time:

Am Donnerstag000003, 03.10.2024 um 22:17 schrieb The Starmaker:

"local time" means "present time".
 

No, that's wrong.
'Local time' means 'the direction of the timeline at a certain spot' and what I would call 'rythm of causality'.
If our world is actually a subspace of something with higher dimensions, than which features would we assume for such a 'super-space'???
My own guess was this:
there exists 'a something', which is named 'spacetime' in context of relativity.
We humans and all the other stuff we see are what I called 'timelike stable patterns' (in spacetime).
These are kind of 'structures' and the hole thing was therefore named 'structured spacetime'.
I have written this longish 'book' (actually it is a presentation) about this idea:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
 From this I would draw the conclusion:
this 'superspace' follows certain mathematical rules, which also apply to bi-quaternions and a mathematical construct called 'clifford-algebra Cl_3.
Why this is so, I have no idea.
Anyhow:
as this a complex valued space, we can rotate axes and the angle of ration the axis of time determins a certain context, which I call 'time domain'.
This is depending on the axis of time, hence time MUST be local.
'Present time' is only a certain spot on that axis of time, which we call 'now'.
This point 'drags' in a way the hyperplane of the present with it.
This hyperplane of the present is actually a 3d-space, which we usually call 'euclidean space'.
This Euclidean space is therefore 'relative', as well as all of its content.
TH
...