Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI
De : Bertietaylor (at) *nospam* novabbs.com (Bertietaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Oct 2024, 11:55:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <413ae85bdaea1309bd7efe6fdc84382d@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 9:37:38 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:

On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 3:25:32 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
I've been sustaining for years that what is known as physics is DEAD, at
least since the 70s.
Since 1905.
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBIvSGLkwJY
>
I want to share this video that Google presented to me (very new), with
a rant of Sabine Hossenfelder about the current state of physics.
>
I invite reading some of the 9,000+ comments, many of them made by
physicists very critical of what physics means today and in the last 50
years.
>
Also, as a proof of the confusion (and corruption) in physics, the fact
that the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to two pioneers in
neural networks (the foundation of OpenAI, ChatGPT, etc.) BECAUSE it
used tools of STATISTICAL PHYSICS, among many other branches, in their
work.
>
Only the cutting edge of fundamental particle physics appears to be
"dead" as you put it. The "easy" problems were all resolved by the
middle of the last century and in subsequent years have been amply
verified by experiment. This includes parts of physics that you
despise like SR, GR and QED. Verified, re-verified and re-verified.
No grand conspiracy, just good science, despite your incorrect gut
feelings.
Biggest hoax ever and the most successful too.
Arindam blasted it in two seconds with his new design rail gun.
The violation of inertia throws out e=mcc=hv physics and updates
classical physics.

>
For the past four decades, theoreticians working in fundamental
particle physics have found themselves in a situation where experiment
is incapable of validating or definitively rejecting their theories
and speculations, and it is this unpleasant situation that
Hossenfelder describes.
Crap's stink cannot be removed by pouring tons of money on top of it.
No greater group of esteemed and organised criminals than the physics
community that tries its best to crush Arindam's correct physics.
>
Fundamental particle physics, however, is only a small part of the
entire field termed "Physics". Huge areas are vibrant with astounding
progress. Simply browse through any issue of Physics World or Physics
Today. The 2024 Nobel Prize was awarded to researchers in a subfield
of physics that didn't even exist four decades ago, which today
embodies a close collaboration between theory and experimental science
and technology, precisely the sort of collaboration which leads to
amazing progress in the field.
Propaganda.
Up Arindam Down Einstein.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Oct 24 * Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI30rhertz
9 Oct 24 +- Fahrenheit 451 (Was: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI)1Mild Shock
10 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Ross Finlayson
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Thomas Heger
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI2Richard Hachel
11 Oct 24 i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Jim Pennino
11 Oct 24 +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
11 Oct 24 i+- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
11 Oct 24 i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Ross Finlayson
12 Oct 24 i +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Thomas Heger
17 Oct 24 i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Ross Finlayson
11 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
11 Oct 24 +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Aether Regained
12 Oct 24 `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI17kazu
12 Oct 24  +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24  i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI2kazu
12 Oct 24  i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak
12 Oct 24  `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI13Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24   `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI12kazu
12 Oct 24    `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI11Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24     `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI10kazu
12 Oct 24      `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI9Bertietaylor
12 Oct 24       `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI8kazu
13 Oct 24        `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI7Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24         `* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI6Jim Pennino
13 Oct 24          +* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI4Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24          i`* Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI3Jim Pennino
13 Oct 24          i +- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak
13 Oct 24          i `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24          `- Re: Most of physics fields are dead. Proof: 2024 Nobel on AI1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal