Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

W dniu 12.10.2024 o 14:22, Python pisze:

Le 12/10/2024 à 13:56, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

Le 12/10/2024 à 11:05, Mikko a écrit :

>

This is actually not true, because the world which SRT describes isn't the world we live in.

>
A failed attempt is still an attempt. Therefore your "because" is wrong.
SR is an attempt to describe the world. Later it was found out that the
world is different but that does not affect what SR is.
>

SRT is about a world, where all thinfgs drift around in a dark and starless void,

>
No, it is not. SR is about the geometry of the world, not about its matter
content except that the matter content must be compatible with the geometry.

>
SR is first and foremost an attempt to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment.
>
The calculation shows that, according to the experiment, w=v+c=c

 It does not.
 

Which is absurd.

 Indeed. But only you say that.

And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

 

[snip idiotic gobbledigook]