Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Oct 2024, 05:47:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <4a4bd9039ac4ca87c6ac3e1f3e3e9004@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:38:28 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:42:00 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>
On 2024-10-13 01:01:03 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 9:52:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote:
>
bertietaylor:
The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
>
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>
***
>
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>
>
@Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):
>
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:
>
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the
fluid!
>
As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
>
As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
>
Jan
>
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.
>
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?
>
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?
>
Because nothing has been done yet.
An experiment isn't an experiment until it has been correctly
interpreted. Your say-so doesn't qualify as correct interpretation.
The first step in achieving that is to publish it under peer review,
Arindam has no peers. People like Newton, Galileo Archimedes,
Bhaskaracharya, Tesla are not to be found any more. Arindam ranks
himself among these sort of people, not with the cowardly careerist
scratching each others' backs while on the lookout for fame and funding
and promotion. In short Arindam is a creative genius, not an academic.

to make it likely that the most obvious errors have been avoided.
Yes it is just here that Arindam's works will be immediately rejected by
esteemed journals on theoretical or rather dogmatic ground by the e=MCC
chanters. Arindam ridicules their dogma so avoidance is his strategy.
So no point trying to get publication in journals.
Not that it is not possible to publish in places by spending a few
thousand dollars. And then the learned ones will say that as it has not
been published in Mature or Science with no scent of a Nobel prize that
paper must be substandard.
Arindam would rather spend that much money on other things.

Next, if it looks worthwhile, others may try to reproduce it.
If they succeed there may be a possibilty that you are on to something.
It already looks more than worthwhile with no need for journal
publication. That the esteemed ones ignore his new, brilliant, useful,
revolutionary works increases Arindam's contempt for them.
>
Base experience so far: all proposed 'reactionless EM drives'
have been found to be based on erroneous interpretation of experiments.
Has Arindam's experiment been repeated with Arindam's involvement? NO.
So Lodder's point is irrelevant.

(on more competent testing)
You have not given any reason for believing yours to be any better.
Typical lie.
But at least they are not denying that Arindam has made a working model
of an electromagnetic rail gun.
What fools these apes be!
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
>
Jan

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Oct 24 * Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed40bertietaylor
6 Oct 24 +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed6Jim Pennino
6 Oct 24 i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5bertietaylor
6 Oct 24 i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed4Jim Pennino
6 Oct 24 i  +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Maciej Wozniak
21 Oct 24 i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2bertietaylor
21 Oct 24 i   `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Jim Pennino
11 Oct 24 `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed33Aether Regained
12 Oct 24  +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed31J. J. Lodder
13 Oct 24  i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed30Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed29Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Oct 24  i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed28Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  i   +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
14 Oct 24  i   +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed21J. J. Lodder
14 Oct 24  i   i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed20Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed17J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i   i i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed16Athel Cornish-Bowden
15 Oct 24  i   i i +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed14J. J. Lodder
16 Oct 24  i   i i  `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed13Bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i   `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed12Athel Cornish-Bowden
16 Oct 24  i   i i    `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed11bertietaylor
16 Oct 24  i   i i     `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed10J. J. Lodder
16 Oct 24  i   i i      +- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1gharnagel
16 Oct 24  i   i i      `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed8Bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i       `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed7Bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i        `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed6gharnagel
17 Oct 24  i   i i         `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5bertietaylor
17 Oct 24  i   i i          `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed4J. J. Lodder
17 Oct 24  i   i i           `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed3Bertietaylor
18 Oct 24  i   i i            `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2Bertietaylor
18 Oct 24  i   i i             `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i   i `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1bertietaylor
14 Oct 24  i   `* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed5J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i    +* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed3Bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i    i`* Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed2J. J. Lodder
15 Oct 24  i    i `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1bertietaylor
15 Oct 24  i    `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor
13 Oct 24  `- Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed1Bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal