Re: Arindam's new physics - energy is eternally created and destroyed

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:09:29 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

On 2024-10-14 09:49:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 10:42:00 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>

On 2024-10-13 01:01:03 +0000, Bertietaylor said:
>

On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 9:52:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>

Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@somewhere.in.the.aether> wrote:
>

bertietaylor:

The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
Arindam Banerjee,
HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
10 Nov 2023
(All rights reserved)
>
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>
***
>
Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0
>
Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s
>
and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and
imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s
>

>
@Arindam (there is no need to use the transparent bertietaylor alias):
>
If the aether is fluid-like, which I believe it to be, as opposed to
your belief that the aether is solid-like, then there is a simple
disproof of your "violation of inertia" claim:
>
There is no violation of inertia or conservation-of-momentum in fluid
mechanics: any unseen/unaccounted for momentum is carried away by the
fluid!

>
As 'everybody' in the 19th century already knew:
the aether must be solid-like.
A fluid aether cannot support transversverse waves,
and this is what electromagnetic waves obviously are.
>
As for Woofster's claims about inertia violations:
they are bunk, with or without an aether,
>
Jan

>
Another e=mcc chap denying reality of inertia violation by Arindam's
rail gun experiment.

>
Where is this work published (in a serious journal)?

>
Why bother about journals? Why not look at what has been done?

>
Nothing has been done until it has generated some peer approval,
or at least a tiny bit of peer interest,

Arindam has no peers. People like Archimedes, Galileo, Newton, Faraday,
Jagadish Bose and Tesla are non-existent today.

>
Right. Let us suppose (a huge supposition, and almost certainly false)
that Arindam's inertia violation turns out to be correct.

It is absolutely certainly true, from his video film showing inertia
violation so there is no question of uncertainty. That 2 sec video with
full explanations via graphs has been there for all in the world to see.
While numbers of views can be manipulated, the fact is that it is still
around and so not forced out of circulation. Some goodness still left,
in this corrupt world, thanks to the Gods and Goddesses.

Will he get
credit for it?

He already has got credit for it, from all honest people who know
Arindam personally and many more who do not.

No, the discovery will be attributed in the textbooks to
the scientist who described and discussed it in a serious journal.

We Arindam's celestial cyeberdogs doubt that. Lawyers will step in to
sue the underwear off those who try to steal Arindam's intellectual
property. Let them try. Lawyers will easily show how Arindam was
deprived of this PhD, hounded out of employment, socially ridiculed, got
his conference papers rejected, the papers sent to serious journals
simply ignored with not even a reply.
With the whole world against him, Arindam had no chance for publication
in a serious journal which costs thousands of dollars. He spent 5
thousand dollars to get a conference paper published on the Hydrogen
Transmission network, a patented invention of his. To no gain for him.
So why should be waste time and money in trying to get journal
publication? Far better to post scientific new information on usenet,
youtube, facebook so that it gets freely and cheaply available at once
to all.
The

best he can hope for is a footnote saying "Banerjee claimed some years
earlier in popular science sources that inertia violation could occur,
but he provided no verifiable evidence of the claim."

No, not at all. Arindam has provided proof of inertia violation despite
tremendous odds against his. There is no parallel in scientific history
for his lone, and supremely brave achievement. Which he has done not
only simply, cheaply, requiring no financial assistance, no technical or
admin help, no labs, no factories, no sponsors, no friends save us his
dogs - while being a loving son, husband, father and grandfather known
for his acting and culinary skills.
I'm reminded of

Marie Mikhailovna Manasseïn: few people today have heard of her, and of
those few virtually none accept her claim to have discovered cell-free
fermentation 15 or so years before Eduard Buchner. OK, her results were
published in a serious journal (Ber. dt. Chem. Ges. (1872)), but her
experiments were unverifiable, and were very badly designed.

no comparison with Arindam's work, some of which was done while doing
PhD (which was denied him). His best work came later. While in 2015-2016
he made the first experiments with a weak power source, in later years
he improved the power supply, changed the rail gun design with better
math modelling and now has shown undeniable inertia violation.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor