Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?

Den 15.10.2024 22:52, skrev rhertz:

This is a comparison of einstenian and newtonian kinematics. In the
moving frame, the distance (0, x') is measured from an observer at the
origin of the frame at rest.
 CASE: Light moving from 0 to x' in the moving frame.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Einstein SR. Light behave as wave, and c is the maximun speed.
 

SR doesn't depend on light being a wave.
The speed of light is invariant whether you model it as
a wave or a particle.
QED, which is an extremely well confirmed theory,
is based on SR, but light is a particle.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Newton. Light behave as corpuscles (photons?). It's allowed c + v
 

The emission theory is thoroughly falsified by several experiments.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
 In astronomy (Cassini, others), there are evidences that radar-ranging
experiments with Venus and Mars, the speed of light is added to the
speed v (between Earth and these planets). Known since 1965.

:-D

 That c+v is possible destroys relativity and cosmology, as Hubble's
results have to be RE-INTERPRETED.

https://paulba.no/div/Brightening.pdf

 It's hard for relativists to accept this, as 110 years of lies with
einstenian physics COLLAPSE completely.

Since all physicists born after 1900 know that the emission theory
is falsified, you have to yet again to make a fool of yourself
by claiming that all physicists are members of a MAFFIA, and profit
from it, and their experimental results are COOKED with the help
of statistical manipulations, fraud, cooking and peer complicity.
:-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/