Re: What is "local time"?

Le 17/10/2024 à 17:27, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 17:10, Python pisze:

Le 17/10/2024 à 17:00, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 15:26, gharnagel pisze:

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 5:54:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 06:07, gharnagel pisze:

>

That's only ONE definition.  Wozniak is a
poor observer because he refuses to see the
other one.  This one:
>
"Time is what keeps everything from happening at
once" -- Ray Cummings

>
I don't refuse to see something just
because it is some mystical bullshit
lacking any content.

>
So nature has no content

>
So the "definition" of yours has no content.

>
So Wozniak believes time is a human invention, and
that's its ONLY definition, yet trees grow, die
and decay.  He must believe that they didn't do
so before clocks were invented :-))
>

It may. Time remains  purely virtual abstract
invented by humans - for the purpose of
describing.

>
So Wozniak pretends he's living in a frozen universe.
Or he's just lying again.

>
No, I don't. Harnagel is just lying again.

>
I'm just trying to understand Wozniak's bizarre assertion
that time only exists because of human inventions.

>
See, poor idiot: after humans invent something
they usually give a name to it. One of their
abstract inventions got the name "time".
>
Can't be that simple? Oh, yes, it can.

 And another one got the name "dog".

 Is dog a human invention

Definitely. We've turned wolves into dogs.

poor stinker

Nice signature.