Re: What is "local time"?

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:10:58 +0000, Python wrote:

>
Le 17/10/2024 à 17:00, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

>
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 15:26, gharnagel pisze:

>
So Wozniak believes time is a human invention, and
that's its ONLY definition, yet trees grow, die
and decay.  He must believe that they didn't do
....
I'm just trying to understand Wozniak's bizarre assertion
that time only exists because of human inventions.

>
See, poor idiot: after humans invent something
they usually give a name to it. One of their
abstract inventions got the name "time".

Trees have been named by humans, so Wozniak is claiming
that humans invented trees.  So the sun has been named by
humans, so Wozniak is claiming humans invented the sun.
This is where his ludicrous claim goes down the rabbit hole.
Humans have invented only the name, not the objects.
Wozniak continually confuses naming an object with the
object itself.  His bizarre assertion is thoroughly
refuted.

Can't be that simple? Oh, yes, it can.

Simple only to a simpleton.

And another one got the name "dog". Dogs do no exist.

At least they didn't before they were named.  But how
could they be named if they didn't exist?  Hmmmm.
And another one got the name Maciej Wozniak, so he didn't
exist before he was named.  It's an unsolvable conundrum.
Maybe if we unnamed Wozniak, he would cease to exist! :-)
One could only hope.