Re: What is "local time"?

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 22:48, Python pisze:

Le 17/10/2024 à 18:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 17:50, Python pisze:

Le 17/10/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze:

Le 17/10/2024 à 16:55, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 17.10.2024 o 15:37, Python pisze:

Le 17/10/2024 à 15:26, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
..

Wozniak might be able to find some followers:
>
"There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather
its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death."
-- Isaac Asimov

>
So far it seems that "one of best logicians Humanity ever
had" has gathered absolutely ZERO followers. How come :-) ?

>
That's simple: logic is overestimated

>
Have you considered the hypothesis that you overestimate yourself
instead?

>
Why - instead? those are independent.

>
"instead" because logic has a weight, can actually convince people

>
Not especially. You've got a logical proof
that the [SR] was not
even consistent - are you convinced?

 I didn't get such a proof.

Yes you did. I've pointed directly
2 denying each other predictions
derivable in the physics of your
idiot guru. That's a prof of inconsistency
and a fanatic idiot screamin "NOOOOO!!!",
spitting and stamping his feet is changing
nothing.
Anyway, what makes you think logic
convinces people? Did you witness
many examples?

  can

recognize that it is consistent.

>
Still it was not. You've got a proof, all you
can do about it is spitting, slandering
and utterly idiotic asserting

 No. No proof in sight but utterly idiotic arguments from
an old ranting Polish demented guy. So ?

  I've pointed directly
2 denying each other predictions
derivable in the physics of your
idiot guru. That's a prof of inconsistency
and a fanatic idiot screamin "NOOOOO!!!",
spitting and stamping his feet is changing
nothing.

 And my answers were not "spitting, sladering, etc." yours
are.
 

poor stinker

 Nice signature.