Re: Relativity and the nature of light. Waves or particles?

Le 17/10/2024 à 23:19, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 17/10/2024 à 22:44, Python a écrit :

Le 17/10/2024 à 18:15, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand  a écrit :

Le 17/10/2024 à 18:05, Python a écrit :

 I didn't say that. This is not my point.
 You've convinced nobody, not even cranks.

 Ne pas convaincre les cinglés n'est pas une preuve d'erreur scientifique.
 Ne pas convaincre les grands pontes de la physique moderne non plus, d'ailleurs.

 I didn't say that it is a proof, but a sing.
 

Les cinglés sont excusables, ils sont cinglés.

 So, according to you, Wozniak, Heger, etc. are mad?
 

Les autres le sont moins, ils sont malhonnêtes.

 No we are not. We spotted flaws in *your* claims. This is
the opposite of dishonesty.
 You have shown, repeatedly, dishonest behavior. Including
faking quotes of living and deceased people.
 

Dans un monde normalement constitué, on devrait dire "Monsieur, ce que vous dites est intéressant, et, en effet, beaucoup de choses paraissent davantage logiques à la façon dont vous les traitez".  Or, les réponses sont plutôt du style, depuis quarante ans (et pas qu'en science relativiste, d'ailleurs, mais aussi en criminologie, en théologie, en politologie) : "Monsieur, vous nous empêchez de tourner en rond, et cela est très déplaisant"
 Ca se passe comme ça, chez Mac Donald's.

 Not at all. Your claims are contradictory, ill-founded, in contradiction with
experiments. You may not like it, but people are allowed to point this to
you.
 You egomania is pathetically pathological. You are not a genius, Richard.
 You are a crook with mental illness and delusions of grandeur, an infantile
behavior and very low integrity. That you've been exercising medicine is
frightening.
   

 I answered your question by placing electromagnetic beeps in blue sent by Terrence to his sister Stella.
We see perfect logic there.
If you don't know how to do it for Stella (according to your request in green)
I'll do it for you.
But don't come and tell me that you understand the theory of relativity and that I'm an idiot.
 I'll put the correspondences in blue for Terrence and the drawing that goes with it.
 I'll put the drawing for Stella, it's up to you to place the correspondences in green, and to show me that you are the second man in the history of humanity to master the principle.
 <http://nemoweb.net/jntp?Q1lfKIOEsSOc7vC0SmfM9lr_4og@jntp/Data.Media:1>
 R.H.

At a certain point, Stella sends a light signal to Terrence. Could you circle in green on your drawing the event of the signal's emission and the event of its reception, on the diagram where the x-axis = 0 represents Terrence's position?
At a certain point, Terrence sends a light signal to Stella, who receives it. Could you circle in blue on your drawing the event of the signal's emission and the event of its reception, on the diagram where the x-axis = 0 represents Stella's position?