Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 19:02:29 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:Fuck your sentence, I didn't claim that.>Inserting the rest of the sentence that dishonest Wozniak
W dniu 19.10.2024 o 15:52, gharnagel pisze:>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:18:37 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:>>
W dniu 17.10.2024 o 21:54, gharnagel pisze:>>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:10:58 +0000, Python wrote:>>
Le 17/10/2024 à 17:00, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :>
See, poor idiot: after humans invent something
they usually give a name to it. One of their
abstract inventions got the name "time".
Trees have been named by humans, so Wozniak is claiming
that humans invented trees.
No, I don't.
Of course he claimed ...
conivingly deleted
of his erratic assertions.Teke your pseudophilosophical mumble and put it
So Wozniak admits defeat (that's what it means when one uses>As for time ->
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_standard
you've got about 20 times mentioned in the
article. Point those which are parts of
nature.
Wozniak is still trying to conflate the philosophical
nature of time
Well, fuck your delusional "philosophical nature
of time", poor idiot.
profanity instead of cogent argument).
So, which, precisely, of the times mentioned in thehttps://www.thecollector.com/philosophy-of-time/
article are parts of nature. Let me guess - none
of them?
The title is "The Philosophy of Time: Study the Nature of
Past, Present, and Future" and a section is "The Nature of
Time"
Wozniak decides to go on being wrong after being presentedSee, poor halfbrain - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
with millions of cases that disprove his assertion. His
pride and arrogance are the only things greater than his
false assertions.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.