Re: What is "local time"?

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 13:39:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.10.2024 o 14:09, gharnagel pisze:

>
Wozniak spits and screams.  The truth hurts, eh?

>
It does, sure, and I didn't claim what you say I did;
yet another slander from a poor little piece of lying
relativistic shit.

Wozniak is lying, and a very stupid lie at that.

So, returning to time: I've provided about 20 examples
of grey elephants/ times which are not a part of nature.
>
You've provided no example of a pink elephant/time
which is a part of nature.

Quote:
I can give examples of millions of objects NOT invented
by humans and named by humans.  For starters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_stars
Wozniak gave a mere 20 examples of time being a human
invention and he claimed that people name things that
they invented.  I gave many more examples of people
naming things that they did NOT invent, which refutes
Wozniak's claim that time MUST be a human invention.
And then I showed that in the philosophy of time, time
is NOT a human invention.  The quote:
"Time is what keeps everything from happening at once"
-- Ray Cummings
is proof that the time spoken of in that quotation is
NOT a human invention, it's an observation of nature.

And your philosophical proof that an elephant must
be pink

Wozniak is telling a half lie.  I never said that time
MUST NOT be a human invention.  My thesis is that in
some definitions of time, it is a human invention and
in other definitions it's not.

is not interesting me, no matter how brilliant it is.

Another Wozniak lie.  If he weren't interested, he
wouldn't have wasted his time posting his B.S. :-))