Re: Relativity theory from other angles

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:42:52 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 10/20/2024 08:04 PM, Bertietaylor wrote:

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 0:35:13 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>

On 10/20/2024 01:54 PM, bertietaylor wrote:

So if we forget iwrong Aristotle and obsolete steam engines explained by
Carnot, we need have no use for conservation of energy laws and entropy
- we say bye-bye to the laws of thermodynamics, following Arindam's
inertia violation experiment.
>
 From that advance, getting rid of the depravity of relativity and the
bunkum of quantum is but a step.
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

>
>
No, that's foolish, also that's a mis-reading,
what is meant is that there are other regimes of relative
and that quantum mechanics is a continuum mechanics,

>
>
It is bunkum mechanics, just pure nonsense.
>

then as with regards to that this mostly means revisiting
earlier abandoned theories, like vis-viva, Lagrange principle,
superstring/supercorde theory as a continuum mechanics,
pseudomomentum, Heaviside/Larmor/Faraday field theories,
aether field theory, the "revisit Heisenberg, Hubble, Higgs"

>
>
All nonsense theories. Replace them with Arindam's physics updating
Newton and trashing the whole of Einstein-Feynman pseudo physics.
>

which since I mentioned that decades ago has seen Aspect-like
photons as definitely waves and all, JWST panning Hubble,
and Higgs and Little Higgs, for a theory with a gravity
like a fall-gravity,

>
Photons are brief em pulses.
Gravity is an electrostatic effect.
Arindam has explained both in detail.
>
>
>
>
that this is for improving _mathematics_

and resultig improving _mathematical physics_, and
_explaining_ it in apologetics, in foundations.

>
Well out with inertia, entropy, relativity and quantum. Out with the
laws of thermodynamics and certainly out with e=MCC=Hv.

>
Yeah, out with physics, right.

What passes for physics, yes, most certainly.
Follow Arindam.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor