Re: Einstein's Mistakes

On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:59:09 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:50:30 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>

E= mc^2 has never been the formula to calculate the energy released in
atomic explosions.

>
Serber and Oppenheimer taught (1943) several waves of scientists that
joined the Manhattan Project with lectures prior joining any team, and
Serber wrote the booklet "Los Alamos Primer", where they taught that
energy liberated in the fission of the atom was of electrostatic nature,
due to the repulsion of the byproducts of the fission, plus radiation.
>
The numbers given in the booklet are almost a match with E=mc^2
calculations of that epoch, but have NOTHING TO DO with relativity, as
Serber wrote in his 1992 book, once some data of the project was cleared
for publishing.
>
But relativists, since 1945 (Time Magazine cover) hyper-hyped the figure
of Einstein and relativism, and the cult succeeded in re-writing
history.

>
Your lack of basic understanding of physics is showing again.
Conservation laws are about the overall result.

Yes lots of energy was created which destroyed a lot. Not by e=MCC but
from Arindam's equation
E=0.5mvv(N-k)N
which explains all mass energy formations including all explosions.

Equations of motion are about what forms
the (conserved!) energy appears in, in the reaction products.

Energy is continually created and destroyed via distance loss to
background galactic noise in our infinite universe.
Conservation laws apply to charges and thus mass.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor

>
Serber and Oppenheimer of course talked to people who would understand,
(so not to you)
>
Jan