Sujet : Re: The Shapiro's experiment HOAX. A 1968 TIME article.
De : tomyee3 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 25. Oct 2024, 23:53:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <c6c0ccbf2f89cd87d98b2f33b7f80af5@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Pièces jointes : 2024_10_25_17_36_13_Deflection_of_light__Wikipedia.png (image/png) On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 21:18:46 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
Prok: The fact that you have resorted to ad hominem shows you cannot
answer my criticisms. You also prove you are inept at logic, as
Einstein, relativists, and relativity pseudoscience are as well. The
fact is that elementary logical analysis is sufficient to completely
refute relativity.
Telling you the truth about your ignorance is not ad hominem.
You do not have the knowledge to follow the explanation at the
level that I can give, even though my current level of expertise is
only that of having *partially* mastered a first-year textbook in
general relativity.
I discovered a long time ago, that one of the best ways to learn a
subject is to teach it. In such a manner, I learned basic calculus
when I was still in middle school, and attained a reasonable mastery
in high school of what would nowadays be called AP Physics and
AP Chemistry in the days before advanced placement programs.
I have attached an image of a section of a very much "simplified-for-
the-masses" article that one of these years I may add to Wikipedia.
I don't plan to actually submit it until I have attained considerably
more than just my current *elementary* mastery of the subject. But
I've learned a lot by having forced myself to systematically write
down what I've learned in the form of an instructional article in
Wiki format.