Re: Einstein's Mistakes

Le 26/10/2024 à 14:17, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 26/10/2024 à 13:47, Python a écrit :

Le 26/10/2024 à 13:35, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand  a écrit :

...
If someone tells you "Doctor Hachel is perfectly ignorant in physics", weigh his words on a scale, before swallowing them.

 It is quite difficult to find anything more true that this statement.

 By the way, you asked me to place the hyperplanes of simultaneity of Terrence and Stella on a drawing.
 I posted the two drawings for you.
 This is unprecedented in the history of humanity, because no one draws relationships as precise, as clear, and as beautiful as me, with horizontal hyperplanes, as logic would require.
 I then explained to you that for Stella, it was necessary to take into account the change of inertial frame of reference, and to adapt it to her own point-of-reference, that is to say her rocket, always at the origin of her frame of reference (it is space that accelerates and deforms around her, but her own rocket does not vary for her).
 It is therefore necessary to take into account the space-zoom predicted by Poincaré on the x-axis. Let D'=D.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)

Poincaré never predicted such a stupidity. You are a liar.

I then explained to you that in this example, there was a hint of reasoning (like in chess the winning move that only Kasparov will find, here it is the good doctor Hachel), and that to find the date on which Stella will receive her answer (she sends her message at six years old and receives her answer at 14 years old, on the way back), you have to use the diagram as follows.
 <http://nemoweb.net/jntp?B_UDIY4o1RGc2Z3c3FLtDlnEdpg@jntp/Data.Media:1>
 However, despite the beauty, clarity and logic of my relativistic thinking, it would seem that you still haven't understood anything, like a few other morons here, who don't understand anything about the theory of relativity, but spit on Hachel.
 All this is horribly stupid, tinged with jealousy and imbecilic narcissism.
 We're just spitting for the sake of spitting.
   R.H. (suivi sci.physics.relativity)

Both of your drawing are wrong. This one is the worse : it shows the light pulse to be in several places at the same time.