Re: The HOAX of E=mc?. Documented history since 1898.

Stupid Jan:
I forgot to REMARK that, by the year 1900, the charge of the electron
WAS CALCULATED BY PLANCK, with an error lower than 0.5% with respect to
current values.
So, by knowing (in the year 1900) the relationship (e/m) (or m/e), due
to Thomson, AMY PHYSICIST KNEW THE MASS OF THE ELECTRON by 1900. In this
way:
(m/e) x e = m
Do you understand this, Jan?
I think that you are a delusional negationist, who will REJECT these
absolutely true historical facts.
Through Rutherford's team, by 1907, the radius of Beta radiation
particles (AKA electrons) was also ESTIMATED.
So, what I wrote IS TRUE in terms of historical facts. What you wrote
came from a HS textbook for imbecile relativists. So, what you have into
your head as facts are pure bullshit, ignorant.
Here it goes, again:
***********************************************
This was known by 1900 (values in c.g.s. system):
1. (Lorentz and others): Energy of an electron at rest E = e²/R
2. Charge e (Planck 1900): e = 4.69E-10 esu (g^1/2 cm^3/2 s^-1)
3. Ratio e/m (Thomson 1900): e/m = 6.32766E+17 esu/g
   OR  m/e = 1.58036E-18 g/esu
4. Mass of electron (1900): m = (m/e) e = 7.4119E-28 g
5. Radius of an electron (1907, Rutherford, others): R = 1.11E-14 cm
6. Energy stored in an electron (1907): E = 1.976E-05 erg or g.cm²/s²
1 erg = 6.2400E+11 eV
So, E = 12.329 MeV, by 1907.
*********************************************
Jan = IGNORANT IDIOT + LIAR + DECEIVER + RELATIVIST + CHARLATAN