Re: Weakness in the results of the three tests of GR shown in rhe lasr century,.

Den 27.10.2024 02:11, skrev rhertz:

 3) Regarding your own supercomputer of 150 GFlops/sec, I recommend
posting it in the site 500.org, because it's a beast.
 It doubles the advertised power of Intel Core i7. But of course that you
know that this is THE INVERSE OF THE TIME FOR ADDING TWO NUMBERS, don't
you?

My Intel Core i9-13900K can:
   add 209 billion integer numbers per second
   make 153 billion floating point operations (flops) per second
A "flop" is addition, subtraction, multiplication or division of
two floating point numbers.

 When multiplications and divisions are measured, the number of GFlops
drop 100 times.

So you don't know what a floating point operation is.
If you had known something about floating point operations,
you would have known that an addition under certain conditions may
take longer time than a multiplication.

PLUS: to compute a formula, each operation with
variables has to be included so, for something so simple as Newton's law
of gravitation, the number of GFlops drop to MFlops, having you to
include the single line of code.
 But you probably got a PC with Intel Core i9, in the range of TFlops.
Good luck with your electricity bill, as it get very, very hot. Later,
the uP cracks down.

I am now running the simulation.
The CPU is running at 5.5 GHz and the CPU temperature is 42⁰C.
I can't hear any noise from the fans.
The computer could run at this temperature for the rest of
my life without "cracking down".
Now I am running 8 instances of the simulation.
The CPU is running at 5.5 GHz and the CPU temperature is 64⁰C.
I can hear some noise from the fans, but not much.
Now I have stopped all the simulations.
The CPU is running at 1.1 GHz and the CPU temperature is 30⁰C.
Complete silence.
--------------
My power supply is 800 W, and its fan is hardly ever running.
I think I can afford the electricity bill.

  I was going to attach some figures about the use of LRL in the
precession of Mercury, but you don't worth the effort.

Why should you? It's irrelevant.

 You are a delusional, irrecoverable relativist who have no limits to
defend yourself by using DECEPTIVE INFORMATION. You even MANUFACTURE IT,
pretentious charlatan!

I am proud to be among the "relativist" you have to claim
are imbecile, ignorant, frauds.
Because if I am no fraud, you are wrong. Right! :-D

 Keep laughing, imbecile + ignorant + relativist (I don't know which name
is worse).

I have a morbid sense of humour, and I find your fury hilarious. :-D
Please keep it up!
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/