Re: The puzzle science is solving

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 15:07, Python pisze:

Le 28/10/2024 à 13:05, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
It is not "how things really are".

>
I agree.
>

It is "which word sequences are good ones".

>
I disagree.  Humans build maps of reality.
They're called scientific theories.

 If "word sequences that are good ones" means that de-compiled forms of the programs we have in our brains i.e. logic, maths and physics (for instance) are matching the actual programs that are correct

But there is no one-and-unique "correct".
There are just local optimums, and they're
floating (what is good now doesn't have to be
good in 100 years).

(because evolution made sur they do)

In some centuries  The Shit will be
only remembered as an antipattern of "how
and why you should never make a scientific
theory or any description of anything".