Re: What is "local time"?

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 18:49, gharnagel pisze:

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:37:38 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.10.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:05:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
Still, J've shown you about 40 examples of a time which
are  obviously a human invention.

>
Irrelevant.  It takes only ONE valid example to the contrary
to refute the assertion

>
And providing 40 I surely did an overkill
of your babbling of time being a part of
nature and dilating.

 I said nothing about dilating.

Really? Didn't you say that time is dilating?
Well, isn't it, poor trash?
 > Wozniak keeps> trying to insert relativity into a topic that

has nothing to do with relativity.

Even amongst many idiocies you said in this and
other threads - this one is rather amazing.

"a: the measured or measurable period during which an
action, process, or condition exists or continues"

>
Well, 40 of mine examples fit here, you've presented
no example fitting and being a part of nature.

 A "measurable period" does not prove that the "period"
is a human invention.  Wozniak is grasping at straws.

Well, if  it's an outcome of a human invented
procedure... anyway, you may use any of the times
- human inventions here and it's going to fit.
How did you imagine that it's describing
something that isn't a human invention?

>
Well, from 40 of mine examples not every one fits
here (UTC and zone times are almoust continous, but
not quite) but many do. You've presented
no example fitting and being a part of nature.

 So Wozniak that "time is a nonspatial continuum" means
that humans created time and space.

They created at least 40 different times and a lot
more of different spaces.

Asserting about someone's booze with no
other reason but disliking him - absolutely
is.

 Woznial insists on being dead wrong even when he's proven
dead wrong:

And Harnagel go for slandering in such case.
That's what The Shit's doggies are trained
for.