Re: The puzzle science is solving

Le 28/10/2024 à 22:09, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 21:05, Python pisze:

Le 28/10/2024 à 18:29, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 17:14, Python pisze:

Le 28/10/2024 à 16:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 28.10.2024 o 15:07, Python pisze:

Le 28/10/2024 à 13:05, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
It is not "how things really are".

>
I agree.
>

It is "which word sequences are good ones".

>
I disagree.  Humans build maps of reality.
They're called scientific theories.

>
If "word sequences that are good ones" means that de-compiled forms of the programs we have in our brains i.e. logic, maths and physics (for instance) are matching the actual programs that are correct

>
But there is no one-and-unique "correct".
There are just local optimums, and they're
floating (what is good now doesn't have to be
good in 100 years).

>
We could agree on that. Rather than local optimums I would say that they are more complete "High level" implementations of the "machine language" in your brains.

>
Bigger and more powerful software doesn't mean
"more complete". It's just bigger and more
powerful.

 Krivine (and his team) views are not about software per se.
it is an analogy between programs in our brains (low level
"programmed" by evolution) and logic/math/physics as "decompiled" by humans from their own introspection.

  So, there is no reason to care about their views.
Introspection? Of - what? Apart of a human brain
nothing deals with words, neither mathematical
way nor any other way.

Ok, you didn't get it and never will.
I wasn't expecting better by the way :-)