Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
>Word salad.
W dniu 29.10.2024 o 13:42, gharnagel pisze:>>
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:29:29 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:>>
Really? Didn't you say that time is dilating?
Not in this discussion
Sure; I did an overkil to your babble from
this discussion and your babble from other
discussions.
My, my! Still no slander here since I've never spoken a>Even amongst many idiocies you said in this and>
other threads - this one is rather amazing.
Wozniak keeps trying to deflect from the fact that his
vacuous assertion has been refuted
Sust in a sick imagination of a poor, lying
and slandering piece of fanatic shit.
A measurement is done by humans. Wozniak deceitfully ignoresHe tries to create an argument merely for the sake of>
argument. He's getting to be soporifically boring.
>Well, if it's an outcome of a human invented procedure...>
It's not.
Really? Isn't a measurement result of a
measurement procedure? Are you sure,
Harrie, poor trash?Proof that Wozniak is the one who libels.
Maybe Wozniak should stop twisting words. It only shows his>anyway, you may use any of the times>
- human inventions here and it's going to fit.
It doesn't "fit." Wozniak is being deceitful.
>How did you imagine that it's describing>
something that isn't a human invention?
How does Wozniak think (and I use that word very loosely
in his case) that a period of time (like, the period of
time from sunrise to sunset) is a human invention and not
a natural process?
How do I think a period is not a process?
Well, i know the meaning of both words.
Maybe you should learn them too?
So humans created the universe? If Wozniak really believes>They created at least 40 different times and a lot>
more of different spaces.
They didn't create time and space.
They did create more than 40 times and many more spaces.
Dishonest Wozniak deleted the rest of my sentence:And Harnagel go for slandering in such case.>
What I said is a perfectly logical conclusion from Wozniak's
words and behavior.
Nope. What yoiu said is an obvious, wild,First of all, it can't be slander because I didn't speak it.
baseless slander;
that's what The ShitCoprophilia again. His brain is really messed up.
is training its doggies for, of course.And libel again. Tsk, tsk. Well, this is getting very boring.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.