Re: What composes the mass of an electron?

On 11/01/2024 11:13 AM, rhertz wrote:

A definition of mass, as found in Google:
>
"Mass is a measurement of the amount of matter or substance in an
object.
It's the total amount of protons, neutrons, and electrons in an object."
>
It's "accepted" since the 60s that protons and neutrons are not
elementary particles anymore. As stated in the Standard Model of
Elementary Particles, protons and neutrons are composed of quarks, with
different flavors.
>
https://www.quantumdiaries.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2000px-Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg_.jpg
>
>
But electrons are thought as elementary particles, so they can't be
formed by a collection of other elementary particles. Even quarks are
currently thought as working together with elementary gluons (QCD, Gauge
Bossons).
>
So, what is THE MATTER that electrons contain?
>
This is one of many FAILS of the current SMEP.
>
Is that the electron's mass is composed of unknown matter? Maybe of
electromagnetic nature?
>
After all, modern civilization is based on what electrons can do, isn't
it?
>
>
THEY KNOW NOTHING, AS IN RELATIVISM!.

You got there a deconstructive, elementary account, into
what's called the trans-Planckian regime, from what's
called the Democritan regime, where Democritus or
Demokrites is who championed "atomism" the theory
while Aristotle or Aristoteles while outlining either
the "infinitely-divisible" or "infinitely-divided",
picked "not atomism because no vacuums", as with regards
to that electrons, protons, neutrons are elementary matter
while photon is still the usual particle in terms of
the quanta of energy, as to how energy is quantized,
at the atomic scale, or as with regards to Avogadro.
For some people, charge is primary, others, matter.
Others, it's neutron lifetime and light speed.
Thusly, the theory, as about the invariants of relation,
may be of the primary elements, variously, a sort of heno-theory,
that usually it's matter and then background energy as heat,
as what boils down to second-law thermo entropy, all quite
usual, then as with regards to usually electron-holes and current.
Then, as with regards to whether "mechanical reduction",
kinetics and kinematics, can define the physics, it's mostly so,
while, most matters of the electrical are related only as
eventually as about the electromagnetic, and piezoelectric,
and Peltier and Seebeck and so on, "electrical reduction".
Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum.