Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 21:36:50 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
>
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
>
>
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

Cutting and pasting this nonsense indicates
some kind of obsession, perhaps OCD.
Anyway, it is easily refuted.  Place a clock
on earth that can be read by the moving
observer.  It will read 86400 seconds/day,
in complete accordance with the definition.
That the observer's clock will read 99766
seconds is in accord with relativity as well
as experimental measurement of time dilation.
Wozniak is conflating two different things
and confusing as well as being confused by
reality.  Definitions are human inventions,
the nature of the universe (like time, space
and time dilation) isn't.