Re: What creates the charge of an electron?

On 11/08/2024 03:55 PM, rhertz wrote:

According to the BBT:
>
About 6.75E+79 H atoms and 2.255E+79 He atoms exist in the visible and
neutrally charged universe (75% and 25% of the total mass M, dismissing
2% from other elements). They were formed from 8.1E+79 original
neutrons, 20' after the Big Bang.
>
That is:
>
81,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
>
neutrons
>
existing in the first 20 minutes after the BB. Only a 20% remained as
neutrons, to form He.
>
These neutrons rotate at an extraordinarily high speed, maybe FTL, which
create internal forces that led to the neutron fission: a proton plus an
electron. But it was a force (gauge force - gluons) that held 80% of
neutrons stable for a while (20'), while temperature fell.  According to
the current theory, the gluon soup held confined quarks with fractional
charges of +1/3 e and -1/3 e, which later formed protons and electrons
by most neutrons decaying, H and He atoms were formed in the first
hours.
>
>
Neutrons: 3 udd quarks (2/3 e - 1/3 e - 1/3 e = 0 e)
>
Protons: 3 uud quarks (2/3 e + 2/3 e - 1/3 e = + 1 e)
>
Electrons: 3 ddd quarks (- 1/3 e - 1/3 e - 1/3 e = - 1 e), free of
gluons gauge.
>
And what is inside quarks, to create charge?  A couple of wavelengths of
light, at such high frequency that can't be measured. Beyond gamma rays.
>
>
It's a theory, after all. But it supports that mass is of
electromagnetic nature, as was thought by 1900.
>
>
Genesis 1:3-5 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.

There are various theories what's "primary" in the theory,
with regards to mass or energy or "fire" or nucleon lifetime
or photon velocity. It's sort of arrive at either, mass and
charge, as two fields having each field exactly one force field,
then the third is variously called two more weak and electroweak,
as with regards to those also being the milieu of other rays like light.
So, there's usually arrived at a sort of tetrad, a four-some,
of quantities, like "proton electron neutron photon", or
"strong-nuclear electrical weak-nuclear electro-weak",
or the old-fashioned "earth air fire water", where
supposedly you've already heard of ancient classical
theories of the elements before you even heard of
the periodic table of atomic elements.
So, it's sort of a tetrad of quantities, or a tetrad of
fields, those a tetrad of forces, then those the same
laws everywhere, that how Einstein puts it is that
there's space and a ray of time called "space-time"
and how Quantum Mechanics puts it is there's the
fields in a field a continous manifold then on that
a field number formalism, according to the quantities
their locations in space, and field occupation numbers,
how many, as with regards to classical and quantum properties,
that then get integrated as with regards to computing them.
Then usual philosophical accounts like the major religions',
for example, include starting with a deductive or declarative
account or how there was "space" and then that being geometric,
then something like "the word" and that being algebraic.
There were electrical batteries like Leyden jars
like 4000 years ago.
"Fire" as the the element of change has
a usual association with the caveman.
People stick light together with electrical field radio
waves because they're both plainly according to frequency
and amplitude how a broadcasting or receiving antenna
results as according to waves, omni- or uni-directional
radio waves, while, light has no interaction with the
electrical field itself and just happens to also be
considerable as accords to "wave-packets", yet light
also has the optical character of light or "lensing",
with why optical light is special, and not electromagnetic.
Most people were told different.
Then nuclear radiation is usually enough rays and light-like,
if so strong that it often ionizes the media.
There are hundreds if not thousands of kinds of "particles",
often called "exotic" or "the zoo".