Re: Time Dilation Experiments

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 8:13:54 AM UTC-7, Ross A. Finlayson wrote:

On Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 7:48:27 AM UTC-7, det...@outlook.com wrote:

On Monday, July 4, 2022 at 10:49:11 PM UTC-5, tjrob137 wrote:

On 7/2/22 9:09 AM, Ed Lake wrote:

[... much nonsense and many false claims]
Police radar guns measure the difference between c and c+v countless times per day.

NONSENSE!
>
Police radar guns measure the frequency difference between their emitted
wave and the reflected wave from the desired target. This is comparing
FREQUENCIES, not speeds.

So, you believe the police give tickets for traveling at illegal FREQUENCIES??
Can't you understand that frequencies can be converted to speeds???
>
Can't you understand that the difference in frequencies RESULTS from
the PHOTON traveling at c hitting a target at c+v, which means that the PHOTON
hits with the c+v ENERGY, not the c ENERGY? And the target sends back a
PHOTON with the c+v ENERGY.
>
The Energy of a photon is determined by its ELECTRIC and MAGNETIC FIELD
OSCILLATION FREQUENCIES. If the photon from a radar gun has oscillation
frequencies of 35,000,000,000 times per second, and if that photon hits an
oncoming target traveling at 70 mph, the photon hits AS IF it had oscillation
frequencies of 35,000,007,292 times per second. The target then sends back
photons that have electric and magnetic fields that oscillate 35,000,007,292
times per second. The difference between the transmitted frequency and the
returned frequency is 7,292 HERTZ (known as the "beat frequency").
>
If you take the transmitted frequency and multiply it by 2 you get
70,000,000,000 HERTZ. If you divide that frequency into the "beat frequency"
to get a percentage, you get 0.000010411666666%. That percentage of the
speed of light is 69.9 mph, which rounds to 70 mph.
>
The radar gun makes the calculation and displays "70 mph." And the cop
gives the operator of the target vehicle a ticket for exceeding the speed limit.
>
I suppose you can just make stuff up to argue that radar guns do not work
that way, but that would just be displaying your personal ignorance, and as
usual, you would be grotesquely wrong.
>
Ed

That's just mostly much too small to make a relativistic effect.
>
It's in acceleration and deceleration that relativistic effects exist at all,
the velocity is that "differences happen faster" down from acceleration.
>
This is where, besides the object in its frame, is its surrounds, each piece its frame.
Accelerating, whatever moment is applied to the terrestrial frame, that
the moment itself moves. Still, accelerating and decelerating,
there are still the surrounds frames, that the entire body inside the moment,
travels.
>
With multiple inputs indeed the views at various points of acceleration and
deceleration, "background Doppler", make for that under potentiality
there is coherence, and: "parallax".
>
I.e. "objects in a fixed field of view move the most, parallax".
>
Energy in the classical moment, is, reading in the classical moment.
>
The ultraviolet and that photons of electromagneticity and photons of
decoherent light are different, is for under catastrophic terms, built
out for imaging why radar and sonic imaging and laser and optical imaging
vary about the optical. (And magneto-core.)
>
I.e. the electromagnetic is under that in a way, that "signals propagate at c"
is "signal wave generation established stands propagating at c". This is
where "the optics are constantly arriving as from c". so, they "background Doppler"
either way.
>
Or, "light's photons are massless, also tachyonic, radio is bradyonic".
>
>
>
.

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_speed_of_light
>