Sujet : Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 15. Nov 2024, 18:27:07
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <z8SdnclnQ4T7Gar6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 11/15/2024 12:42 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
On 2024-11-14 21:48:39 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Jan: An inconsistent theory does not predict. Relativity is an ideology,
so you are ironically projecting your faults onto others. Then you don't
know what you are defending because you can't tell me what it predicts.
>
No quoted text, no reply,
>
Not even an indication of which Jan he is referring to. Can he not know
that we have two sane people of that name here?
>
You mean Linguist Burse's crowd of usenet bots?
Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic
Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic