Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.

On 11/15/2024 01:33 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 11/15/2024 11:02 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.11.2024 22:43, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

Paul: Obviously, you can make atomic clocks in space run as on Earth or
proper time, just as pendulum clocks can be adjusted to latitude. We
don't infer from the different rates of pendulum clocks that time runs
at different rates. We adjust their lengths. You cannot infer from the
fast running of atomic clocks in space that time is running faster in
lower gravity. That is nonsense.

>
Please quote what you are responding to.
>
Please, answer this question:
>
How do you measure time?
>
>

>
Nucleon lifetime?
>
>

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/70915/does-a-constantly-accelerating-charged-particle-emit-em-radiation-or-not
Of course the nucleon lifetime is quite too long to much
measure it, yet it reflects on that nuclear processes,
indicate being a clock, or, "half-life in the centrifuge".
Of course there are theories where the linear is Galilean
and a sort of specious Lorentzian as a FitzGeraldian,
while in the rotational then the space contraction makes
for examples of including the atom itself.
Experiments with the Allais pendulum are often claimed to
demonstrate a sort of fall-gravity during planetary alignments.
An atomic clock array can detect hand-waving the
space-contraction around it, without much moving at
all its "rest" frame.
The discussion referenced indicates that it's rather
up in the air, whether acceleration makes according
to an aether or not radiation or not, for example
as would reflect timing.
So, ..., nucleon lifetime.