Sujet : Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 16. Nov 2024, 09:01:43
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lpr1psFr9usU3@mid.individual.net>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am Samstag000016, 16.11.2024 um 02:52 schrieb rhertz:
...
Is it clear now? ChatGPT endorses relativity, even when fail to present
facts that led to acceptance on each field. In particular, cosmology and
quantum physics.
It refuses to explain the role of relativity in fields like solid state
physics, biophysics, industrial physics, medical physics, etc.
My own appraoch was this:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharingThe main concept is based on very few assumption like e.g.:
a system is something identitifiable and what you regard as such.
But there are no natural closed systems.
A system has imaginary borders, which are infinitely thin.
another assumption:
matter is 'relative', hence particles are not real lasting entities, but are 'observer dependent'.
Gravitation was not covered by my own appraoch, because it could be left within GR.
Also QM was not a part from this method, which was meant to conncet GR and QM, but didn't aim to replace them.
...
TH