Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR?

Le 16/11/2024 à 05:54, Sylvia Else a écrit :

On 16-Nov-24 9:52 am, rhertz wrote:

ChatGPT entered in crisis here, after I asked HOW MANY (worldwide).
 >

 You realise that it's just a language model based on trawling the Internet?
 It's not intelligent. I doesn't know anything. It cannot reason. It just composes sentences based on word probabilities derived from the trawling.
 And guess what? The Internet contains a lot of garbage; garbage that's been fed into the language model.

TchatGPT says absolutely anything when asked pointed questions. He is incapable of understanding the simple notion of anisochrony (two watches placed in the same frame of reference build different systems of simultaneity), and constantly answers only on the same wavelength: the dilation of chronotropy by change of inertial frame of reference.
He mixes everything up.
It is impossible to have a coherent discussion.
He resembles point by point most scientific interlocutors on usenet forums: he tirelessly repeats what he has learned by heart and is incapable of demonstrating creative intelligence.
He is just a simple search engine.
R.H.