Sujet : Language of Philosophy of Science? LoL (Was: Is Curved Space An Improvement Over The Use of the Concept of Forces?)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 18. Nov 2024, 00:37:35
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vhdunv$b0sd$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
What is this?
> particularly expressed in the language of the
> philosophy of science?
Do you mean "The Philosophy and Science of Language"
has also a Language of Philosophy of Science?
Mind blown
Issac Newton: If a thing isn't moving, then it
probably won't move unless something moves it
17th Century Europe: 😲 awe and 🙌 celebration
https://9gag.com/gag/agmAK6g88Ross Finlayson schrieb:
Furthermore, realists can say that Einstein was a
naive conventionalist in his earlier works, while
in his later works they do include "an aether hypothesis"
and "a clock hypothesis", realists. Einstein was
later a reflective conventionalist in his goal of realism.
Not all have "perfect mathematical mental maturity"
with regards to the perspectives on the philosophy
of science, "realists" and "anti-realists" as after
"nominalist" and so on, indeed one may look at many
philosophers in science who in the course of their
mental develoment in mental maturity towards
the inter-subjective _and_ realism, formative events,
and particularly expressed in the language of the
philosophy of science, which is a particular
reasoned wisdom itself.