Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
On 11/21/2024 10:30 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:Of course, any difference in effect,>>
How about put a Weber bar next to a cyclotron and turn it on and off?
>
Have you tried turning it on and off?
>
How about you put a linac through a cyclotron,
and variously turn them on and off?
>
How about one of those hand helicopters?
Or just one of those tree seeds that wafts its way down?
>
>
It may seem kind of simple, you get a linear accelerator
or linac with a neutron stream, and a cyclotron with
charged particle beam next to it, then you start the
linac and then cycle the cyclotron and observe the
resulting bumps in the linac according to the
space-contraction in the cyclotron, thus establishing
space-contraction in the cyclotron, comcomitant
to the space-contraction in the linac.
>
>
>
The linac being linear and the cyclotron rotational, ...,
demonstrating along with Einstein's second-most
famous mass-energy equivalency function that
it's rotational-only with respect to relativistic mass,
while the linear stays Galilean though with, "space-contraction",
and for frame-dragging and so on, the linear and
rotational being fundamentally different, yet of
course of the same combined overall principles,
of the mechanics.
>
>
If you want to, "prove", which is an un-scientific way
of saying something, "Einstein's e=mc^2 has a central moment".
>
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.